Mail Archive sponsored by
Chazzanut Online
jewish-music
Re: kol isha
- From: Robert Cohen <rlcm17...>
- Subject: Re: kol isha
- Date: Tue 27 Feb 2001 20.12 (GMT)
The reason I would think Margot's posting is "a digression from kol
isha"--and bringing up relevant economic issues is *not* a halakhic
digression, by the way--is that kol isha applies (for better or for worse,
etc., etc.) to women's *voices* and hence to women *singers,* not--so far as
I know--women instrumentalists like Margot.
Have Margot and other women instrumentalists on this list (or of their
acquaintance) been excluded *as women* from playing--not singing--in
Orthodox venues? I'm curious (and interested).
--Robert Cohen
>And I realize this seems like a digression from Kol Isha, I've departed
>from
>the talmudic issue, but in many ways it still is the same issue. A rose by
>any other name...
>
>Margot Leverett
>
_________________________________________________________________
Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com
---------------------- jewish-music (at) shamash(dot)org ---------------------+
- Re: kol isha, (continued)
- Re: kol isha,
Margotlev
- Re: kol isha,
Margotlev
- Re: kol isha,
Asissel
- kol isha,
Alex J. Lubet
- Re: kol isha,
TROMBAEDU
- Re: kol isha,
K. B.
- Re: kol isha,
Robert Cohen
- Re: kol isha,
Margotlev
- Re: kol isha,
Asissel
- Re: kol isha,
TROMBAEDU
- RE: kol isha,
Reyzl Kalifowicz-Waletzky
- RE: kol isha,
Reyzl Kalifowicz-Waletzky
- Re: kol isha,
MaxwellSt
- RE: kol isha,
Reyzl Kalifowicz-Waletzky