Mail Archive sponsored by
Chazzanut Online
jewish-music
re: Klezmer article in this week's Forward
- From: Mattflight <Mattflight...>
- Subject: re: Klezmer article in this week's Forward
- Date: Mon 12 May 2003 03.18 (GMT)
I was in a bar last week talking with another list member, while
listening to music being played by another list member, when another person
that we were talking to who had no knowledge of the music asked them how
their instrument would sound if it was in this ensemble? To which they
replied that if they are playing more traditional it would sound more like it
was out of a military band, and if the band was more modern, their would be
more things the instrument could do.
My question, that I didn't ask is what is traditional? We have a hundred
years of recorded music to look at. Almost every recording is as traditional
as the next, because recordings document history in a specific time and
place. Think of recordings as a sound photograph, and you hope that you have
a good caption to be able to place it in its historical context.
In the past 30 years their has been a historical music movement in all
genres. At the core, the "klezmer revival" is on of these historical music
movements. Of the early bands the one that is most easy to define what it was
doing is the Klezmer Conservatory Band, and their attempts to recreate the
big band/theater orchestra sound of the 1920's. The later bands though that I
want to look at are Budowitz and Khevrisa. These two ensembles fall into the
period instrument group. They attempt to recreate the sound of a specific
time and place. (And even though Steve Greenman writes new tunes today, they
still attempt to recreate this earlier sound.)
The reason I bring up these two groups is that I was talking to Yale
Strom after a screening of one of his movies at the Boston Jewish Film
Festival this past fall about the last chapter in his book where he talks
about the "klezmer revival." I asked him what his goal for the chapter was,
and he seemed to be leaning towards saying that it was about where he thought
the direction of klezmer music should go. And he has a direction that he
thinks the music should be going, and it is possible to see through how uses
quotes from all over the klezmer spectrum for this goal. He has his specific
time period that he calls traditional and thinks that the music should push
down that path of exploration.
By referring to one time period as traditional, it devalues all other
time periods. Even if the stand out musicians from other time periods are put
on pedestals, we don't always look at their entire careers, but very narrow
time periods. By devaluing parts of the recorded history though we are
helping the cause of missing buzz words. (To which I in this commentary have
done, I have used the term Klezmer without giving you my individual
definition.)
So to get back to Budowitz and Khevrisa, when I asked Yale what he
thought about these bands, he was like what are they doing? I responded that
they are looking over the wall of recorded sound and attempting to recreate
what came before recordings started. And I came away with the feeling that he
thought this was a bad use of klezmer scholars time.
I disagree, I think that pushing musical scholarship in all directions
can only add to our knowledge. Hopefully one of these scholars looking at the
prerecorded time period will be able to write a music theory text that open
up the key of how to write new tunes without each person having to figure out
rules on their own. While others of us can do work looking at what the
recordings made in this past 100+ years says about music and the Jewish
community.
What I think that we need to do is somehow get away from using the term
klezmer. It is too broad and is doing our listeners a disservice for us to
continue to us it. Each person will bring their own music history into what
is "Authentic klezmer," and it isn't the same for each person. If I new a
good catch phrase I would tell you. But the Jewish musicologists of the first
half of the 20th century might of had it right calling it Jewish Music. While
it is more wordy, maybe Eastern European Inspired Jewish Music, with some
other descriptive terms is a better way of talking about it.
Matt Temkin