Mail Archive sponsored by
Chazzanut Online
jewish-music
Re: Meaning of "Klezmer"
- From: MaxwellSt <MaxwellSt...>
- Subject: Re: Meaning of "Klezmer"
- Date: Sun 02 Jan 2000 05.17 (GMT)
<< 1) Preservationist/European (e.g., Brave Old World, Perlman)
2) Contemporary (e.g. Zorn, Klezmatics)
3) Entertainment (e.g. KCB, yours truly--Maxwell Street) >>
I was riding to a gig and listening to a program about Duke Ellington, on
which it was stated that, when he first played in London for cultured and
prestigious audiences who took him seriously as a composer, he came to see
himself differently. They continued: In America, he was viewed as an
ENTERTAINER, whereas the in Europe he was viewed as an ARTIST. So, in case I
have offended the KCB (and swiped myself inadvertently at the same time), let
me hasten to add that the use of the three categories above is a sort of
shorthand, and not intended to suggest that those whose approach to the music
is entertaining reduces it artistically to some sort of casual amusement. In
actuality, I think that artists that take themselves very seriously may not
have more genius than those who entertain--Charlie Chaplin comes to mind, for
starters.
Lori in Chicago
---------------------- jewish-music (at) shamash(dot)org ---------------------+
- Re: Meaning of "Klezmer",
MaxwellSt