Mail Archive sponsored by
Chazzanut Online
jewish-music
NYT article (long) on Milken conference
- From: Sam Weiss <SamWeiss...>
- Subject: NYT article (long) on Milken conference
- Date: Wed 12 Nov 2003 04.31 (GMT)
At 06:30 PM 11/11/03, "Geraldine Auerbach" <jewishmusic (at)
jmi(dot)org(dot)uk> wrote:
>Can you reproduce the article for those that don't want to subscribe to
>the NYT
TRADITION, TRADITION, TRADITION? NOT IN AMERICAN JEWISH MUSIC
By Allan Kozinn
(New York Times, 11/7/03)
During his two decades on the faculty at the Jewish Theological Seminary,
Neil W. Levin has been studying the evolution of Jewish music in America,
and he has come to a pair of conclusions that, on the surface, seem
contradictory. The first is that the earliest Jewish communities, in
colonial times, considered it so crucial that the music of the Sabbath and
holidays be preserved in all its traditional details that they imported
cantors to sing the services decades before they brought over the rabbis.
The second is that, this early traditionalism notwithstanding, the American
experience so thoroughly reshaped Jewish music, both secular and sacred,
that much of what is regarded today as deeply traditional is actually
comparatively newfangled. The Yiddish musical theater that thrived on
Second Avenue in the early decades of the 20th century is an almost
entirely American form, and the klezmer dance music that has had a revival
and expansion in recent years was influenced by both jazz and the Yiddish
theater. And those popular forms -- as well as some from outside the Jewish
world -- influenced sacred music as well.
Exactly how this evolution came about, and how it has reflected the broader
social history of Jewish life in the United States, is the subject of "Only
in America," a five-day conference and concert series that runs through
Tuesday. Presented by the Jewish Theological Seminary and the Milken
Archive of American Jewish Music, "Only in America" has a split focus.
It is, in part, a slightly early celebration of the 350th anniversary of
the establishment of the first Jewish community in what became the United
States.
Actually, the anniversary is next year. In 1654, a group of Dutch Jews who
had settled in Recife, Brazil, fled the colony when the Netherlands lost it
to Portugal. (Portugal, like Spain, had undertaken a program of forced
conversions and expulsions in the late 15th and early 16th centuries.)
After an eventful journey, 23 of the Jews from Recife landed in New
Amsterdam. Congregation Shearith Israel, an Orthodox synagogue on West 70th
Street and Central Park West, traces its origins to that first group of
refugees.
Beyond the anniversary, though, the conference celebrates the first CD
releases in the Milken Archive of American Jewish Music series on the Naxos
label, a compendium that will eventually include about 600 works on 50 to
80 compact discs, to be released by 2006. Mr. Levin is the artistic
director of the project, which was supported by the Milken Family
Foundation and started when Lowell Milken, the chairman and president of
the foundation, decided that the vast repertory of Jewish-American works --
including those by non-Jewish composers on Jewish themes -- should be
methodically documented. Since 1990, the foundation has spent $17 million
on the project, which includes everything from sacred music of the colonial
era, ecstatic Hasidic music and modern services composed for synagogue use
to Yiddish theater songs and classical concert works and operas.
"I'm not actually an expert in music -- I'm a historian of American
Judaism," said Jonathan Sarna, a professor at Brandeis University, who is
to give the keynote lecture at the "Only in America" conference on Sunday
afternoon. "But I think the CD series is something that will be looked back
on as one of the great legacies of the 350th anniversary.
"I think that making this music available will lead to an outpouring of
research on Jewish-American music, which has not been much studied,
especially the sacred music. And the music is important in studying
American Jewish culture, because the debates concerning music in the
synagogue that have taken place since the beginning of the 19th century, if
not through the whole 350 years, have been second only to the debates
concerning the participation of women in the synagogue service."
Women and Music
To a significant degree, in fact, debates about music and debates about
women have been intertwined in Judaism. The traditional view is that women
not lead services or sing as cantors or in choirs, on the ground that a
woman's singing voice may be so alluring as to distract men from the
service. Reform Judaism, as well as many Conservative synagogues, have
abandoned that notion. Modern Orthodoxy has, in recent decades, juggled
ways to involve women in the service without breaking traditional taboos
concerning "kol isha" (or, the woman's voice). In Hasidic communities, the
traditional approach prevails.
Women's voices aside, the relationship between Judaism and music has been
fraught for much of the last 2,000 years. Music was a crucial element of
the service from ancient times, and among the duties of the Levitical
priests -- in addition to conducting the sacrificial services -- was
overseeing the instrumental and choral music heard in the Temple in
Jerusalem.
It is clear from the Psalms that instrumental music was an important part
of worship in ancient times: Psalm 150 offers a preferred orchestration,
advising that God should be praised with the trumpet, harp, lyre, reed
organ, flute and cymbal.
Soon after the destruction of the Second Temple by the Romans, though,
instrumental music was prohibited by rabbinical decree, as a sign of
mourning. Over the centuries, this ban became conflated with the idea that
instrumental music was not to be a part of the Sabbath service in any case,
because it constituted a variety of work prohibited on the day of rest.
Actually, performance itself does not violate those restrictions, but
repairing or even tuning an instrument is considered equivalent to putting
the finishing stroke on a piece of work, so instrumental performance was
banned to prevent that transgression.
Different Rituals
In the diaspora, the ritual and musical elements of the service developed
differently in different parts of the world. Ashkenazic Jews, descended
from those who settled in Eastern Europe, and Sephardic Jews, including
those who remained in the Middle East and those who fled there after the
Spanish and Portuguese explusions, developed distinct approaches to
everything from the chanted melodies used to read the Torah to music
created for secular use. Although the Ashkenazic approach was more dour at
first, the development of Hasidism in the 18th century went a long way
toward restoring a joyful musical component to the service, and spawned a
literature of ecstatic melodies, the performance of which remained strictly
vocal.
With the birth of Reform Judaism, in early 19th-century Germany, the
radical notion was advanced that continued mourning for the Temple made
less sense than using instrumental music to enhance the beauty of the
service, and since the movement also advocated a less stringent reading of
Sabbath restrictions, concerns on those grounds were swept away.
In the United States, all these approaches collided in distinctly American
ways. One thing Mr. Levin hopes to do, in the course of his conference, is
to turn the clock back and revive a baseline service of sorts, against
which later changes can be put in perspective. Tomorrow morning at the
Jewish Theological Seminary, the cantors Henry Rosenblum and Aaron
Benssousan will preside over a re-creation of a Sabbath service from the
colonial era. To anyone familiar with a modern Jewish service, the music
may be surprising, since many of the melodies heard in even the most
traditional synagogues today were composed in the 19th or 20th centuries.
"There will be a choir," Mr. Levin said, "which in colonial times would
have been men and boys. But it won't sound choral; it will sound
participatory. We've pinned down, as far as one can, the music that was
sung and the way it sounded in colonial times."
And yet concessions to modernism have been made as well. Because the Jewish
Theological Seminary is an institution of Conservative Judaism, women will
sing in the choir and read from the Torah, and seating will be mixed rather
than separate, all of which would have been scandalous to Jews of colonial
times.
A Divisive Force
This illustrates an unusual point that Mr. Sarna hopes to make in his
lecture, which is that music has often been a divisive force in American
Jewish culture.
"There have been three kinds of disputes," Mr. Sarna said. "One has been
about the kind of music that is appropriate to the synagogue. In colonial
times, music was very tightly regulated, and by the way, the same is true
of Protestant music as well, and that probably is no accident. But the idea
was, you were to sing the music that was customary, and you were not
invited to introduce new music. There was very little flexibility.
"The second debate concerns who should sing the music. Should everybody
sing? That was certainly the case in the colonial era, and again, the same
was true in many churches. But in the wake of the American Revolution, and
changes in approach to religion generally in the late 18th and early 19th
centuries, we see people forming classes to improve the music of the
synagogue, and those classes become choirs. That raised the question of
whether there will be a musical elite, which will seize control of the
service. And at some synagogues, you begin to see rules that say explicitly
that only the choir will sing: the congregation -- men and women -- become
auditors."
The Role of Choirs
The move from congregational singing to polished choruses, Mr. Sarna added,
led to the harmonization of the service's melodies. That appears not to
have caused great upheaval, but the constitution of the choirs did: Reform
choirs included women, Orthodox choirs did not but recruited boys who could
sing soprano and alto lines.
"The third debate," Mr. Sarna continued, "is about the accompaniment of the
singing. The introduction of the organ was meant, just as in churches, both
to create an atmosphere that is awe-inspiring and to create order when the
service begins, by drowning out cacophonous singing. It sets the mood and
solves musical problems. And the debate is between people who support it
for what it does and those who argue that it is a violation of tradition
and practice."
Eventually, synagogues that used organs began bringing in other instruments
as well, and in the 20th century Reform synagogues in the United States
began commissioning established composers -- Darius Milhaud and Joseph
Achron, for example -- to write music for Sabbath or holiday services with
full orchestral accompaniment.
Several of the conference events will explore that repertory. The services
tonight at Congregation B'nai Jeshurun, a Conservative synagogue (257 West
88th Street), will include settings of the Friday evening psalms and
prayers by 20th-century composers, among them Kurt Weill, Max Helfman,
Charles Davidson, Isadore Freed, Julius Chajes and Samuel Adler. For the
occasion, Mr. Adler is to conduct what is billed as a "Choir of a Thousand
Voices" -- actually, the congregation and conference participants, who have
had a few rehearsals.
More of this music, as well as a newly commissioned work for cantor, choir
and klezmer clarinetist, by Ofer Ben-Amots, will be heard in "Voice of
America: A Musical Salute to Cantor Richard Tucker," at Alice Tully Hall on
Sunday evening. Tucker, one of the Metropolitan Opera's star tenors in the
1950's and 60's, worked as a cantor at the Brooklyn Jewish Center in
Flatbush long before he began singing opera, and he continued to make
cantorial recordings, as well as appearances as a guest cantor, through his
entire life.
The Tucker tribute, however, skirts an issue that may be raised at some of
the conference discussion sessions: that in the United States, at least,
Jewish sacred music goes through fashion cycles just as other music does.
At the moment, there is a pervasive feeling at Orthodox congregations that
operatically inflected cantorial singing of the kind Tucker specialized in
is a thing of the past.
Exploring Jewish Themes
In recent decades, the preference has been for more straightforward
readings of the service and for the music of Rabbi Shlomo Carlebach, a
charismatic New York rabbi who, starting in the 1960's, wrote reams of
simple, catchy melodies in a style that combines the influences of folk
music and Hasidic song.
But more formal compositions, of the kind to be heard in the B'nai Jeshurun
service and the Tucker tribute, found their way into the concert hall.
Works on Jewish themes by Aaron Copland, Miriam Gideon and Stefan Wolpe are
to be discussed during a conference session on Sunday morning; a session on
Monday, moderated by Milton Babbitt, examines Schoenberg's music, with a
Tuesday session devoted to music of Weill, Castelnuovo-Tedesco and Ernest
Bloch.
Some of the concerts celebrate this music as well, including one tomorrow
evening at the Manhattan School of Music, in which Paul Schoenfield's
"Klezmer Rondos" will split the bill with Kurt Weill's "Eternal Road." A
vast biblical pageant on which Weill collaborated with the playwright Franz
Werfel and the director Max Reinhardt, this is regarded by many as Weill's
great unappreciated masterpiece, and by others as a score so unwieldy as to
be unworkable.
Composed soon after Hitler's rise to power, in 1933, the work is set in a
synagogue where a group of Jews are hiding during a pogrom, listening to
their rabbi recounting stories from the Bible as a way of putting their
destiny in perspective. At its premiere, at the Manhattan Opera House in
1937, the four-act work required 245 performers and more than 1,700
costumes, and ran until 2 a.m. Since that first production, it has never
again been staged intact, although several truncated versions have been
attempted.
For the Milken Archive project, Mr. Levin spent two years reconstructing
the score, in a collaboration with the Kurt Weill Foundation, and selected
73 minutes of music for the recording, in which Gerard Schwarz conducted
the Berlin Radio Symphony Orchestra, the Ernst Senff Choir and seven
soloists. Mr. Schwarz will conduct the same excerpts -- he prefers to call
them a suite -- tomorrow.
"This is quintessential, exquisite Kurt Weill," Mr. Schwarz said. "It has
its issues as a theater piece. It would be extremely difficult to produce
in the way it was envisioned, with four stages on top of each other, each
with different action, and a huge cast. But I believe this music deserves
to be heard. And I think it's important to remember what it is -- a piece
that portrays the devoutness of this group of Jews, assembled in their
synagogue, telling their stories and discussing their fate."
Mr. Levin observed that he has tried to balance scholarship with events
meant to appeal to the more casually curious. "These conferences are not
just for the ivory tower," he said. "When I proposed the first one, in
1987, the seminary said: `O.K., but if you get 40 people, we'll consider it
a success.' But we had 250 people, mostly laymen. And at the last one, six
years ago, we had to turn people away."
_____________________________________________________________
Cantor Sam Weiss === Jewish Community Center of Paramus, NJ
---------------------- jewish-music (at) shamash(dot)org ---------------------+