Mail Archive sponsored by
Chazzanut Online
hanashir
[HANASHIR:4908] Re: Cantorial qualifications
- From: Jonathan Gordon <jbgordon...>
- Subject: [HANASHIR:4908] Re: Cantorial qualifications
- Date: Wed 12 Jan 2000 01.25 (GMT)
Yes holly, i agree. i had no interest in coming to ny when i studied, it
would be great if people had more choices. all the same, zionists cant be
afraid of an ocean voyage, as the saying goes.
Holly wrote:
> Jonathan,
>
> Point well taken. However, I believe that the real problem is not about
> whether or not a cantor should be rigorously educated. The real problem is
> the lack of opportunity for that training. The HUC only offers the
> training in New York, which is an insurmountable obstacle for many people
> who would otherwise sign up. Rabbis get three choices, New York,
> Cincinnati and Los Angeles, but cantoral candidates have no other choice.
> I would not mind living in NY (if I could possibly afford it while in
> school full time) but my husband hates New York. He loves Cincinnati and
> can tolerate Los Angeles (where we live now), but there's no opportunity
> for training at those HUC schools.
>
> So, everyone please correct me if I'm wrong, but I have a feeling that more
> people who gladly undergo the rigors of training if there were more than
> one place to get it. I know it's not everyone's argument, but it's the
> argument/obstacle for alot of us.
>
> Holly
>
------------------------ hanashir (at) shamash(dot)org -----------------------+