Mail Archive sponsored by
Chazzanut Online
hanashir
[HANASHIR:3583] Re: HANASHIR digest 610
- From: BEBWH <BEBWH...>
- Subject: [HANASHIR:3583] Re: HANASHIR digest 610
- Date: Fri 23 Jul 1999 19.17 (GMT)
as a point of clarification, the Torah says nothing on the matter of the
the fast days. It was an ordained fast day. Zechariyah says that
someday they will be feast days. The sources bring down that will be in
the the time of redemption. R' David Golinkin, a Masorti Rabbi in Israel,
wrote a tshuvah showing up till the Geonim and most Rishonim, the fasts
were considered reshut (optional) since there was no peace and no war.
Only later did a posek (law-code) say 'they are optional, but everyone
wants to. we are in the habit of being stringent.' His tshuvah, taking
our possession of the state of Israel into account, I believe permits
breaking the fast at minchah. It may be found in the first edition of
the Va'ad halacha of Masorti.
It is made mention in the Tana"ch (scriptures) and is very
important, but I wouldn't say it's from the Torah.
When saying from the "Torah" I am considering the Shulchan Aruch and other
Rabbinic Codes to be Torah. Because the Va'ad Halacha of the Masorti (is that
what we call Conservative in the USA?, honestly don;t know) says so is that
what is done in Israel?
<<Not true.. .Halacha does not change. Every circumstance is evaluated
and an answer is given ACCORDING TO HALACHA>>
that is semantics. the halakha does change. it's name means 'the way we
go', the system is more constant than 'the way we go'. a brief look at
Jewish history will prove my point that the halakha has always been
diverse and changing.
i further don't believe you needed to have been so polemical in
your email.
Sorry
From: BEBWH (at) aol(dot)com
<< For example I'll bet we all know you don't find insturments in
Orthodox synagogues on Shabbat yet there were insturments in the Holy
Temple on Shabbat. Any of us guitar players can tell you there's no issue
of work for me when I play so why does the tradition say we can't play on
Shabbat now?>>
please, the prohibition of instruments on the sabbath is a gezera, a
decree. It is not a m'lacha. please see Gruenfeld's "The Sabbath" for a
brief overview of what m'lahca is. it is not 'work.' it is more complex
than that. Shabbat is a day when we rely on things that existed before
its onset, a day when we remove all divisions between ourselves and God
and sorta go back to nature. We become self-reliant and must focus on
ourselves and our family. That is why some early responsa permitted
Telephone use on the Sabbath for non-business purposes. It brings people
together. accepting the ban on instruments on shabbat takes a leap of
faith, to accept the rabbi's teachings. I can only say 'go and learn'
for you to understand what it means.
There was a time that turning lights on and off was also permitted but we
have evolved and in most cases are more stringent. Remember eating Wrigleys
Gum, it used to be Kosher too till we found out. The whole definition of
Kashrus is totally different today because we know more. Musical insturments
are definitly a gezara,
but if you were to play an insturment nobody refers to it as going against a
gezera, it's considered Halacha that you just don't.
well, that is that. i hope this list will soon calm down again and get
back to 'why do the words for v'haer eineinu say "v'lo nevosh, v'lo
nikalem, v'lo niqashe, l'olam va'ed.
Why? This is also fun and informative. Thanks for the dialogue.
----------------------- Headers --------------------------------
Return-Path: <owner-hanashir (at) shamash(dot)org>
Received: from aol.com (rly-yh04.mail.aol.com [172.18.147.36]) by
air-yh01.mx.aol.com (v60.18) with ESMTP; Fri, 23 Jul 1999 14:15:32 -0400
Received: from shamash3.shamash.org (shamash3.shamash.org [207.244.122.42])
by rly-yh04.mx.aol.com (v60.18) with ESMTP; Fri, 23 Jul 1999 14:15:16 2000
R >>
------------------------ hanashir (at) shamash(dot)org -----------------------+
Hosted by Shamash: The Jewish Internet Consortium http://shamash.org
------------------------ hanashir (at) shamash(dot)org -----------------------=
- [HANASHIR:3583] Re: HANASHIR digest 610,
BEBWH