Mail Archive sponsored by
Chazzanut Online
hanashir
[HANASHIR:3582] Re: HANASHIR digest 610
- From: Benjo <bfleisch...>
- Subject: [HANASHIR:3582] Re: HANASHIR digest 610
- Date: Fri 23 Jul 1999 18.16 (GMT)
hello-
i thought i wouldn't be posting again for a while, but i again felt the
desire to clarify some points. here goes:
From: BEBWH (at) aol(dot)com
<< I'm pretty hungry right now. Know why? Check the Hebrew calender.
Would I rather be doing other things today? Swimming, playing my guitar,
watching a movie? You bettcha. But the Torah says we can't.>>
as a point of clarification, the Torah says nothing on the matter of the
the fast days. It was an ordained fast day. Zechariyah says that
someday they will be feast days. The sources bring down that will be in
the the time of redemption. R' David Golinkin, a Masorti Rabbi in Israel,
wrote a tshuvah showing up till the Geonim and most Rishonim, the fasts
were considered reshut (optional) since there was no peace and no war.
Only later did a posek (law-code) say 'they are optional, but everyone
wants to. we are in the habit of being stringent.' His tshuvah, taking
our possession of the state of Israel into account, I believe permits
breaking the fast at minchah. It may be found in the first edition of
the Va'ad halacha of Masorti.
It is made mention in the Tana"ch (scriptures) and is very
important, but I wouldn't say it's from the Torah.
<<Not true.. .Halacha does not change. Every circumstance is evaluated
and an answer is given ACCORDING TO HALACHA>>
that is semantics. the halakha does change. it's name means 'the way we
go', the system is more constant than 'the way we go'. a brief look at
Jewish history will prove my point that the halakha has always been
diverse and changing.
i further don't believe you needed to have been so polemical in
your email.
From: BEBWH (at) aol(dot)com
<< For example I'll bet we all know you don't find insturments in
Orthodox synagogues on Shabbat yet there were insturments in the Holy
Temple on Shabbat. Any of us guitar players can tell you there's no issue
of work for me when I play so why does the tradition say we can't play on
Shabbat now?>>
please, the prohibition of instruments on the sabbath is a gezera, a
decree. It is not a m'lacha. please see Gruenfeld's "The Sabbath" for a
brief overview of what m'lahca is. it is not 'work.' it is more complex
than that. Shabbat is a day when we rely on things that existed before
its onset, a day when we remove all divisions between ourselves and God
and sorta go back to nature. We become self-reliant and must focus on
ourselves and our family. That is why some early responsa permitted
Telephone use on the Sabbath for non-business purposes. It brings people
together. accepting the ban on instruments on shabbat takes a leap of
faith, to accept the rabbi's teachings. I can only say 'go and learn'
for you to understand what it means.
well, that is that. i hope this list will soon calm down again and get
back to 'why do the words for v'haer eineinu say "v'lo nevosh, v'lo
nikalem, v'lo niqashe, l'olam va'ed.' I never heard the middle two
phrases before. also, in 'wherever you go' my roommate says the second
verse 'you're always at home, because God made you a Jew.' and she
insists this is the correct version.
any comments?
shabbat shalom.
-Benjamin
------------------------ hanashir (at) shamash(dot)org -----------------------+
Hosted by Shamash: The Jewish Internet Consortium http://shamash.org
------------------------ hanashir (at) shamash(dot)org -----------------------=
- [HANASHIR:3582] Re: HANASHIR digest 610,
Benjo