Mail Archive sponsored by
Chazzanut Online
jewish-music
Re: Ouch! (A new payment scheme for klezmer?)
- From: Marvin Margoshes <physchem...>
- Subject: Re: Ouch! (A new payment scheme for klezmer?)
- Date: Thu 08 Apr 2004 13.10 (GMT)
Remember that "he also serves, who only sits and waits".
The scheme would have to take into account the possible damage from one
substandard musician. I once heard a performance of Beethoven's Ninth by a
semi-pro orchestra, with timpani out of tune!
- Original Message -----
From: <music (at) sterlingmp(dot)org>
To: "World music from a Jewish slant" <jewish-music (at) shamash(dot)org>
Sent: Wednesday, March 31, 2004 3:12 PM
Subject: RE: Ouch! (A new payment scheme for klezmer?)
> Herewith, for general edification or general wincing, a recent New York
Times piece on a, um, new
> approach to paying symphony orchestra members (plus two letters to the
editor that followed) --
> Anyone want to try this with klezmer ensembles?
>
> (Only kidding -- I think)
>
> Beethoven: Unfair to Labor!
> By JAMES R. OESTREICH
>
> HIS is the last thing American orchestra managers needed to hear just now,
as several of the most prominent
> orchestras negotiate new contracts with their players.
>
> >From Bonn (Beethoven's birthplace) comes word that violinists of the
Beethoven Orchestra are suing to be paid
> more than their wind- and percussion-playing colleagues, because they
produce more music. In most of the
> orchestral literature, the argument runs, the strings play almost
continuously, but the brasses, for example,
> tend to play in bursts, often widely separated, when they play at all.
>
> The Bonn musicians are hardly the first to have noticed. There have been
steady rumblings in most orchestras
> about disproportionate workloads and the unusual demands of certain works.
But a grudging collegiality tends to
> hold sway, if only for practical reasons. Any attempt to quantify the
contributions of the various sections or
> individuals in an orchestra would soon bog down in a numerical morass that
would scare off even accountants.
>
> The reports from Bonn framed the issue, nonsensically, in terms of the
number of notes played. Why nonsense?
>
> Because there are notes, and there are notes. To stick with Beethoven,
take a simple passage, selected more or
> less at random, from the scherzo of the Ninth Symphony (measures 77-92).
In these 16 bars, the first violins
> play 34 notes; the second oboist, 16. But the oboist's are measure-filling
dotted half notes, tied together,
> demanding an almost constant expenditure of breath. The violinists play
three notes in most measures but don't
> play at all in four of them. Comparisons are not only odious, they are
impossible.
>
> And there are myriad other such trivialities. But there are also more
vital issues. Various instrumentalists
> face different strains, both psychological (an oboist's solo line is
mercilessly exposed, whereas string
> players can sometimes achieve anonymity in numbers) and physical (brass
players and percussionists are more
> susceptible to hearing loss from their own instruments than string
players).
>
> These are all imponderables, and that is how they are typically left. But
what happens if the German violinists
> win their case?
>
> American orchestra managers will undoubtedly pull out what hair they have
left in these economically trying
> times. And audiences in Bonn, who probably get their fill of Brahms to
begin with, may hear a lot of his
> Serenade No. 2, a charming piece that is not often performed, because it
is written for an orchestra that
> pointedly excludes violins.
>
>
> March 30, 2004
> A Penny a Note, but Nothing for the Rest?
>
> To the Editor:
>
> A March 25 Arts Briefing item reports that the 16 violinists in the
Beethoven Orchestra in Bonn are seeking
> additional pay because they have to "read and play `extra notes.' "
>
> What counts as a note? A string player should be able to make a few bucks
off a glissando alone, especially a
> long one. (Trombone glissandos can only go a tritone, so a trombonist's
lifetime earning potential would be
> more limited.) And should a whole note be worth four times as much as a
quarter note?
>
> Pity the poor percussionists: given how few notes are played on timpani
(or, worse, a triangle), how could they
> possibly make a living?
>
> This could affect concert programming as well. For example, if the
orchestra gets low on cash, that's the end
> of Bruckner for that season.
>
> And where does this leave the pianist? After all, a piano plays a great
deal more notes than a violin. Indeed,
> since each note on a piano is actually three strings, pianists could ask
to be paid on a "per string" basis.
> This could bankrupt an orchestra in no time.
>
> TONY ALTERMAN
> IAN ALTERMAN
> New York, March 27, 2004
>
>
> To the Editor:
>
> Those mercenary Beethoven Orchestra fiddlers in Bonn are lucky that Sir
Rudolf Bing is not around to respond to
> their lawsuit for more pay per note ("Beethoven: Unfair to Labor!," Week
in Review, March 28).
>
> I recall my first season (1961) in the Metropolitan Opera Orchestra when,
to protest the seven-performance and
> heavy rehearsal schedule, I was on a hastily formed string committee to
appeal for "work relief or some
> financial compensation."
>
> Sir Rudolf welcomed us into his office with a wry smile, leaned back in
his chair and listened to our
> spokesman, David Berkowitz (a violist), explain that if we were paid a
penny a note, we string players would be
> millionaires after one Wagner "Ring" cycle.
>
> "Gentlemen," replied Sir Rudolf softly, "as far as I am concerned, I wish
you would stay home and permit me to
> mail you your paychecks."
>
> Crestfallen, we left, but not before Dave courageously expressed our
disappointment with our director's
> "arrogant" response.
>
> Sir Rudolf, to our surprise, did not castigate the violist for his parting
salvo. But in his 1981 memoir, "A
> Knight at the Opera," he listed all the Met singers, conductors,
choreographers and ballet dancers in an
> appendix, which, he wrote, "represents the total artistic roster" of the
Met during his tenure of 22 years -
> yet conveniently omitted the members of the orchestra.
>
> LES DREYER
> New York, March 28, 2004
>
>
>
>
>
---------------------- jewish-music (at) shamash(dot)org ---------------------+