Re: Roseanne not Roseanneadanna

[Trudi Goodman <goobietheg...>]

So Nu?
As I've already stated, I'm more than happy to try and contact her...now can 
we all agree at least somewhat on how we would like to/and what we would 
like to formulate as a question to her?
   Trudi the G


>From: Velaires (at) aol(dot)com
>Reply-To: jewish-music (at) shamash(dot)org
>To: World music from a Jewish slant <jewish-music (at) shamash(dot)org>
>Subject: Re: Roseanne--Footnote
>Date: Tue, 27 Jun 2000 12:56:15 EDT
>
>Appropriate demeanor? Showbiz presentation of an image is an issue aside 
>from
>whether somebody posesses -- offstage -- the appropriate demeanor to do
>anything of serious personal personal gravity, whether it is to run a day
>care center or to teach scripture.  The two are unrelated.
>
>In Roeanne's favor, anybody who was married to Tom Arnold probably has a 
>need
>to take spiritual matters very seriously as they have already known hell.
>
>skip heller
>
>

________________________________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com

---------------------- jewish-music (at) shamash(dot)org ---------------------+