Mail Archive sponsored by
Chazzanut Online
jewish-music
Re: To Dan Singer
- From: Velaires <Velaires...>
- Subject: Re: To Dan Singer
- Date: Sat 19 Feb 2000 20.57 (GMT)
Authenticity is probably best defined as sounding like you sound because you
want to, instead of sounding like you've been told is the correct way to
sound because some toady has a party line to enforce, anyway.
I don't think Tarras sounded appreciably like Brandwine. And I don't think
Statman sounds like either. But they all register on my little emotional
geigercounter. And I'm certainly not wrong for this.
These arguments about authenticity being based on the playing heard from
records made by the 1945 rarely occur outside of ethnic music. I have never
heard anybody say Dizzy Gillespie didn't refer enough to Louis Armstrong to
be considered the "true" jazz. Nor have I heard anyone say that Stevie
Wonder didn't refer to Louis Jordan enough to be considered the "true"
rhythm'n'blues. Jewishness has endured and developed past Yiddishness,
although Yiddishness still plays a part. If music is a language beyond
words, why should it be fenced into rules more stringent than language held
to words?
skip h
---------------------- jewish-music (at) shamash(dot)org ---------------------+