Mail Archive sponsored by
Chazzanut Online
hanashir
[HANASHIR:9134] Belief vs action in Judaism
- From: Tamar D. Earnest MD <tde...>
- Subject: [HANASHIR:9134] Belief vs action in Judaism
- Date: Mon 21 May 2001 17.11 (GMT)
Dear Callie,
You wrote
"In a society where we are the minority, we set aside a few times a
week or less when we know everyone else in the room believes in
basically the same things."
The great thing about Judaism, as opposed to Christianity, is that we
do not know what the person next to us believes." We do know what they
do (or are doing at that moment) that is Jewish. Judaism is very much
about doing and very little about doing. We have no crede, no written
dogma. Although Maimonides listed his "13 articles of faith" even he
probably didn't believe in all of them (and got his books burned,
banned and severely criticized for some of what he wrote).
We define ourselves as Jews by what we do - how we behave in prayer
situations, making food choices, treating our parents, sharing our time
and property in giving tzedakah, writing lyrics for a song, or
studying. No one asks us what we believe. Lots of people ask us what we
do. For example: "Do you go to synagogue on Shabbat" or "do you keep
kosher". Most of the time no one will ask if we do these things because
we believe that G-d descended on some place called Sinai and dictated a
big book of rules to a man names Moses, or because our parents did
this, or because we feel a closeness with our Jewish community and this
is our way of expressing that closeness. Sometimes we get into those
philosophical discussions. But then we go back to doing those Jewish
things.
A story is told of a discussion among some members of a synagogue, on
Yom Kippur, about whether or not G-d exists. There were strong
arguments pro and con. When the call to resume the davvening went out
they all said "Sh'ma Yisrael" together.
I hope to see and hear you at H"N. Your music is a joy and a delight.
L'hitraot,
Tamar D. Earnest MD
-----Original Message-----
From: Callie Maidhof [SMTP:anomocal (at) swbell(dot)net]
Sent: Thursday, May 17, 2001 1:03 PM
To: hanashir (at) shamash(dot)org
Subject: [HANASHIR:9104] Non-Jewish organists, etc.
For me, the issue with a non-Jewish organist would be intent. With as
much work as we put into each service to make it perfect - perfect
music, musicians, sermon, attendance, sound, lights, atmosphere, ... -
I think we can forget that in the end it's not a performance. It's not
a theatre production or a musical show. It should be a prayer . The
congregation should be able to see and hear the prayer so that they can
find it in their own hearts. Every note an instrumentalist plays, or a
singer sings, was written as a prayer; and should be treated as such.
A non-Jewish organist may have trouble praying the notes instead of
playing them, not because he is inferior or unfeeling, but because he
doesn't hold the same beliefs! I would have trouble singing a solo for
a Catholic mass, or playing my guitar. The reason we hold services is
so that we may gather and pray. In a society where we are the minority,
we set aside a few times a week or less when we know everyone else in
the room believes in basically the same things.
I'm not saying a non-Jewish instrumentalist is always inappropriate; it
just has to be handled correctly.
Respectfully,
Callie Maidhof
Overland Park, Kansas
------------------------ hanashir (at) shamash(dot)org -----------------------+
- [HANASHIR:9134] Belief vs action in Judaism,
Tamar D. Earnest MD