Mail Archive sponsored by
Chazzanut Online
hanashir
[HANASHIR:8282] Re: Gender-balanced prayers
- From: Ros Schwartz <rs4...>
- Subject: [HANASHIR:8282] Re: Gender-balanced prayers
- Date: Tue 20 Feb 2001 21.09 (GMT)
There is a difference between "gender-neutral", which tries to avoid
gendered references altogether, and "gender-balanced" or
"gender-sensitive", which acknowledges that gendered references may at
times be appropriate - but should be used in a balanced fashion, and
only when they enhance the understanding of a particular concept.
God is neither male nor female, but we sometimes need anthropomorphic
images to help us understand what is beyond human comprehension. (In my
opinion) it is valid to explore both the feminine and the masculine
aspects of God - as long as this is done in a _balanced_ ratio - and
with the awareness that our human imagery, with our limited human
understanding, is necessarily incomplete.
- Ros
Jonathan Gordon wrote:
>> okay. here's another question, tho related. in gender sensitive prayerbooks
>> and materials we happily expunge words like lord, and the pronoun he,
>> although
>> the actual hebrew is exactly that. but we leave in sabbath queen and exalt
>> the
>> feminine side of sh'chinah. anybody have a problem here? if its good for the
>> goose, is it good for the gander? i am personally unsettled with the
>> un-sexing of liturgy, but wish to be free of oppresive modelling. what do you
>> folks think?
>
>
> jonathan gordon
>
>
>
>
------------------------ hanashir (at) shamash(dot)org -----------------------+